Accelerate your thought leadership by contributing to our blog. Join our community of experts now!
Enjoy reading this blog post written by our experts or partners.
If you want to see what Databox can do for you, click here.
Conan, what is best in life? Having the right tools for the job, using them well, and seeing the results. In procurement, the right tool is a well-designed procurement KPI dashboard.
The difference between streamlined operations and costly inefficiencies often lies in how well you have your finger on the pulse of your operations. Without the right tools, you risk drowning in a sea of data — invoices, contracts, bills, all tied to the procurement of raw materials or services. The sheer volume can be overwhelming.
But there’s a lifeline: procurement systems. These invaluable tools shoulder the burden of record-keeping and data organization, ensuring no piece of crucial information slips through the cracks. These systems transform the chaos of countless documents into a harmonized chorus of data points — all neatly stored in your company’s data system.
However, the real game-changer is the procurement KPI dashboard. A robust business dashboard doesn’t just help you stay afloat — it charts a course toward more efficient, streamlined operations. It transforms the deluge of data into clear, actionable insights that drive decision-making.
Ready to not just survive but thrive in the world of procurement? Let’s dive into how a KPI dashboard can help you harness your data to your advantage.
Procurement is a crucial part of any business. To make sure it’s running smoothly, you need measurable data — and that’s where KPIs come into play. They let you keep tabs on all aspects of procurement, from the cost and quality of purchases to the timing and sourcing.
But KPIs do more than just track performance. They offer insights that can guide your decisions and help you spot trends or problems early on. For example, by keeping an eye on your “Compliance Rate,” you can see if suppliers are meeting your requirements, which can help you negotiate better deals. Similarly, tracking the “Number of Suppliers” can help you manage risks by ensuring you’re not too dependent on a single supplier.
And let’s not forget about cost-saving. KPIs like “Purchase Order Cycle Time” and “Purchase Price Variance” can tell you a lot about the efficiency of your procurement operations. By monitoring these KPIs, you can identify opportunities to streamline your processes and reduce costs.
In short, KPIs turn raw data into actionable insights. They’re essential for improving your procurement processes, achieving your goals, and boosting your bottom line. But remember, KPIs are not one-size-fits-all — you need to choose ones that align with your business’s specific needs and goals.
Procurement is a multifaceted process, and so are the KPIs used to measure its performance. There are several categories of procurement KPIs, each focusing on a specific aspect of the process.
Let’s take a closer look.
These KPIs provide a high-level view of the procurement process, giving insight into the overall health and efficiency of the department. They help managers identify areas that may need additional resources or attention. For example, a high number of suppliers may suggest a complex supply chain that could be simplified, while a low compliance rate may point to issues with supplier management. General management KPIs are typically used by department heads and executives who need an overview rather than detailed data.
Delivery management KPIs focus on the supply chain and logistics aspect of procurement. They track the efficiency and reliability of the delivery process from the supplier to the business. By monitoring these KPIs, businesses can identify bottlenecks or inefficiencies in their supply chains and work to resolve them. Improvements in these areas can lead to shorter lead times, more reliable deliveries, and reduced costs.
Quality assurance KPIs are crucial for maintaining the standard of goods and services procured. They measure the performance of suppliers in terms of the quality of their products or services. These KPIs are particularly important in industries where high-quality products are crucial for business success, such as manufacturing and healthcare. Poor supplier quality can lead to product defects, recalls, and loss of customer trust, making these KPIs vital for assessing risk.
Financial KPIs track the impact of procurement activities on the company’s bottom line. They help businesses identify cost-saving opportunities and monitor the financial performance of their procurement department. These KPIs can highlight areas where negotiation or cost-saving strategies could be improved. By tracking these metrics, businesses can make more informed decisions about their spending and resource allocation, ultimately improving their profitability.
Risk management KPIs help identify and evaluate potential risks in the procurement process. They consider factors such as supplier reliability, geopolitical issues, contract compliance, and more. These KPIs are essential for businesses that want to minimize their exposure to supply chain disruptions, financial losses, and other procurement-related risks. Monitoring them allows businesses to proactively manage these risks, ensuring the stability and reliability of their supply chain.
Supplier Relationship Management KPIs focus on the strength and efficiency of interactions with suppliers. They assess the quality of these relationships, which can have significant impacts on the procurement process and overall business performance. These KPIs include measurements of supplier satisfaction, dispute resolution effectiveness, and communication efficiency. By keeping a close eye on these metrics, businesses can foster strong, productive relationships with suppliers, leading to better negotiation outcomes, improved product quality, and more reliable delivery schedules.
Innovation and Sustainability KPIs examine how procurement activities contribute to an organization’s broader strategic goals around innovation, sustainability, and social responsibility. These metrics might measure the proportion of spending with suppliers that meet certain environmental or social standards, or the extent to which procurement practices contribute to the development of innovative products and services. By tracking these KPIs, businesses can align their procurement activities with their strategic goals, while also showcasing their commitment to sustainability and innovation to stakeholders. This can enhance their reputation and competitiveness in the market.
Related: Understanding Business Dashboard Types: How Can Strategic, Analytical, Operational and Tactical Dashboards Contribute to Your Company’s Success?
Assessing procurement performance involves a systematic process of measuring and evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of your procurement activities. It’s a crucial aspect of ensuring that your procurement operations align with your overall business goals. Here are the key steps involved in this process:
PRO TIP: Avoid information overload by tracking too many KPIs at once. Prioritize those that align most closely with your strategic objectives, and review and revise them as those objectives evolve.
Related: How to Develop an Effective Reporting Process with Databox
While not directly a part of procurement, warehouse management plays a critical role in an organization’s supply chain and can impact the efficiency and effectiveness of procurement processes.
Effective warehouse management ensures that the organization has a clear understanding of what goods are available and where they are located, which can assist in streamlining procurement activities and reducing costs. Below are some key KPIs for warehouse management:
Monitoring these KPIs will help you identify any potential issues in your warehouse operations and take corrective actions promptly. This will ultimately lead to more effective supply chain processes and better business outcomes.
To optimize your procurement operations and strategy, it’s essential to track a variety of metrics. Let’s dive into some of the most important ones to include in your procurement dashboard:
Not sure which metrics to track or dashboards to build? Have old reports you want to recreate in Databox? Share your dashboard needs with one of Databox’s product experts and we’ll build you a customized dashboard for free.
Here is an example of what your dashboard can look like… (just imagine your data populating here)
And here’s another one…
We get it. You may not have the time to build out the perfect dashboard before your next meeting.
Luckily, we do.
Connect with someone on our team, share the metrics or areas that you need to track, and we’ll build your dashboards for you in just 24 hours.
Learn more about our free dashboard setup here, reach out for assistance via email or chat, or book a call.
The Compliance Rate KPI gives businesses an understanding of how well suppliers fulfill their contractual obligations and the effectiveness of the business’s procurement function. This KPI represents the overall agreements between a company and a supplier, including critical aspects such as delivery time, maximum reaction time to issues, and special discount offers.
An effective compliance rate leads to cost savings through better supplier negotiations and efficient procurement processes. It also provides insights into supplier performance, enabling the company to identify areas for improvement and take corrective actions.
The Number of Suppliers KPI allows businesses to manage the balance between dependency and diversity in their supplier base. It tracks the count and type of suppliers a company engages with, categorized into contracted and unlisted ones.
Reliance on a few suppliers can lead to a risky dependency, particularly if a supplier fails to deliver at the last moment. Conversely, too many suppliers may reduce potential discounts and increase management complexity. An optimal number of suppliers helps to balance these factors, ensuring a steady, cost-effective supply of goods and services without an over-reliance on a few providers.
Spend Under Management is a critical procurement strategy that aims to optimize expenditures. It encompasses the strategic management of spend that involves established rates with preferred suppliers, spend under contract, and control systems to ensure adherence to negotiated prices.
Regular evaluations of this metric can reveal significant potential for unrealized savings. It’s essential to conduct regular spend analyses, supplier evaluations, and contract reviews to identify areas for operational and strategic savings. Employing modern tools, such as datapine, can assist in this process.
Consolidating purchases and negotiating volume discounts can also lead to substantial savings. It’s important to avoid repeated purchases of similar products and instead negotiate volume discounts, leading to considerable cost savings
Maverick Spend refers to the procurement of goods or services from non-contracted or non-preferred suppliers. It presents a considerable challenge for organizations as it can lead to increased costs and damage relationships with preferred suppliers. For instance, an organization may miss out on the benefits of previously negotiated discounts with contracted vendors, leading to inflated expenses.
Additionally, maverick spending can indicate communication gaps within the organization, with some departments potentially managing their purchases independently, disregarding existing contracts. To mitigate this, organizations should adopt a centralized system that communicates purchasing policies across all departments. It’s also crucial to monitor this KPI across different business areas and departments to identify any areas of concern and implement necessary corrective measures.
This KPI measures the percentage of purchases that are made under a contract with suppliers. It’s a function of a spend under contract and total spend.
Higher contract utilization can lead to more predictable costs and reduced risk, as contracts often provide agreed-upon pricing and terms that protect both the buyer and the supplier.
By tracking contract utilization, companies can identify opportunities to increase their use of contracts, which may lead to better prices, improved service levels, and stronger relationships with suppliers. If contract utilization is low, it may indicate that the procurement team needs to negotiate more contracts or improve adherence to existing ones.
The Purchase Order Cycle Time is a crucial KPI that can greatly influence the overall efficiency of a company’s procurement process. This metric essentially measures the end-to-end timeline of a purchase order, from its creation to the final payment. It provides insight into the efficiency of the procurement department and the reliability of suppliers.
A shorter cycle time can be an indicator of efficient procurement processes and an agile and responsive supplier. It can also be indicative of a strong relationship between the company and its suppliers, where orders are processed and completed in a timely manner. This is particularly critical when there are urgent orders that need to be fulfilled quickly.
However, a longer cycle time may signal potential issues in the procurement process or supplier performance. These could be due to bureaucratic delays, inefficiencies in the approval or payment process, or delays on the supplier’s end.
To improve Purchase Order Cycle Time, companies can look into streamlining their internal processes, enhancing supplier relationships, or even leveraging technology to automate certain aspects of the procurement process. Monitoring this KPI closely can help companies improve their turnaround times, optimize staff productivity, and ultimately reduce the overall cost of the procurement function.
Lead Time is a crucial KPI in procurement that measures the total time taken to fulfill an order from the initiation of a purchase action to the receipt of the production model into the supply system. This metric helps businesses understand the efficiency of their supply chain and identifies opportunities for improvement.
This metric is comprised of both production lead time (the time taken to manufacture the product) and administrative lead time (the time taken for the administrative process to occur such as placing the order, processing the order, and shipping the order). In some industries, such as electronics manufacturing, lead times can span from a few weeks to several months. However, it’s important to note that lead time differs from purchase order cycle time, which only takes into account the time from when a request is made to when the order is confirmed.
A key objective for businesses should be to minimize lead time as much as possible without compromising the quality of the goods or services. By setting a target amount of days for lead time, a company can monitor and measure supplier performance over time. If a supplier consistently fails to meet the target, it may be necessary to take corrective action, such as renegotiating terms, sourcing alternative suppliers, or revising internal processes.
The Emergency Purchase Ratio is a procurement KPI that measures the proportion of unplanned or emergency purchases to total purchases over a given period of time. These are typically orders made in response to an unexpected shortage of products.
A high Emergency Purchase Ratio can indicate deficiencies in a company’s procurement strategy, such as poor forecasting or inventory management. Emergency purchases can often be more expensive due to the urgency of the demand, leading to higher costs. Therefore, a lower Emergency Purchase Ratio is generally desirable as it suggests more efficient procurement planning and potentially significant cost savings.
However, achieving a low Emergency Purchase Ratio requires effective planning and risk management. By understanding the factors that lead to emergency purchases, a company can take proactive steps to mitigate these risks, such as maintaining a safety stock of critical items, improving supplier relationships to ensure reliable deliveries, or implementing a more robust forecasting system. It’s important to regularly review and adjust the target to align with changes in business operations and market conditions.
The Supplier Quality Rating is a critical metric that provides insights into the performance and reliability of suppliers. This KPI is not just a reflection of the quality of goods or services provided by the supplier, but also an indicator of potential future performance and the overall health of the business-supplier relationship.
A consistent low quality rating for a supplier can signal a need for intervention, whether it’s re-negotiating terms, implementing corrective measures, or considering a change of supplier. It can also highlight weaknesses in the supply chain that need to be addressed to maintain operational efficiency and profitability.
Other factors like the supplier’s ability to meet demand (supplier availability), the defect rate of their products, and the percentage of returned items are also crucial elements to consider when evaluating a supplier’s quality rating. A comprehensive evaluation using these metrics can provide a data-driven foundation for future contract negotiations and supplier relationship management.
A quality rating system backed by data and analytics can provide an objective and nuanced perspective on supplier performance. It allows for ongoing monitoring and evaluation, which is critical in maintaining high standards and achieving business objectives. The goal is to strive for high quality scores (above 90%) from suppliers, ensuring that they meet or exceed the business’s expectations consistently.
The Vendor Rejection Rate and Costs KPI is a crucial metric for evaluating a company’s internal quality management strategies. It focuses on the frequency and financial impact of rejecting vendor products due to non-compliance with quality standards or other requirements.
A growing rejection rate could indicate issues with the vendor’s quality control processes, requiring immediate attention and remedial action. Similarly, an increase in rejection costs could reflect inefficiencies in the procurement process, which could be caused by factors such as poor vendor selection, ineffective negotiation, or inadequate quality inspections.
It’s important to correlate these two metrics to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the overall vendor performance. For example, an increase in both the rejection rate and costs could suggest severe issues with the vendor, necessitating immediate action like renegotiating the terms or even seeking a replacement vendor.
Effective communication with vendors is critical when addressing these issues. It allows for the identification and resolution of potential bottlenecks, negotiation of solutions, and maintenance of positive vendor relationships. In turn, this can prevent future increases in the rejection rate and costs, minimizing potential disputes or claims.
Overall, by closely monitoring and analyzing the Vendor Rejection Rate and Costs KPI, companies can gain valuable insights into their quality management strategies, identify opportunities for improvement, and ensure the sustainability of their business.
Purchase Price Variance (PPV) is a key KPI that tracks the difference between the standard price (what a company expects to pay) and the actual price (what a company ends up paying) for a good or service. This metric is vital in understanding the efficiency of a company’s spending and its ability to negotiate with vendors.
A positive PPV (where the actual price is less than the standard price) indicates efficient negotiation and purchasing decisions, leading to cost savings. It could also signal a favorable market condition where the company was able to purchase goods or services at a lower price than expected.
On the other hand, a negative PPV (where the actual price exceeds the standard price) might suggest less efficient purchasing decisions, poor negotiations, or an increase in market prices. This could indicate a need for the company to reassess its procurement strategies and supplier negotiation skills.
By tracking PPV against a target, a company can identify areas where its procurement function is not performing as planned and implement necessary changes. This could involve reevaluating vendor contracts, improving negotiation strategies, or revising budgeting processes. Effective management of PPV can lead to more efficient spending, better cost control, and ultimately, improved profitability.
The Purchase Order Coverage is a crucial metric within procurement departments as it serves a dual purpose: ensuring accuracy and preventing fraud. By comparing invoices received from suppliers with their corresponding purchase orders, this KPI assesses how accurately the suppliers are delivering what was ordered and agreed upon. A high Purchase Order Coverage rate (ideally above 95%) indicates that suppliers are delivering as per the orders, which is an essential element in maintaining the trust and integrity of the procurement process.
This KPI is also significant in terms of cost efficiency. Discrepancies between purchase orders and invoices can lead to unnecessary administrative costs and time wasted on resolution. Therefore, maintaining a high Purchase Order Coverage rate can contribute to the overall operational efficiency of the business.
Technologies such as 3-way-matching automation have made it easier for businesses to ensure high purchase order coverage. These systems automate the process of cross-checking purchase orders, receiving documents, and vendor invoices, reducing the potential for manual errors and improving the speed and accuracy of the process.
This KPI gauges the average expense of processing a purchase order, from inception to invoice closure. The interpretation and application of this KPI can vary significantly across businesses, making it one of the more debated procurement KPIs.
The cost of processing a purchase order internally can be influenced by numerous variables, and can reportedly range anywhere from $1.34 to $437. It’s crucial that each company defines what they consider as the ‘cost’ in this context, which could span direct and indirect costs, staff involvement, and processing time.
The objective of monitoring this KPI is to enhance the efficiency of the procure-to-pay cycle, minimize errors, and curtail expenses. The variables chosen to measure this KPI should align with this goal. For instance, if a company wants to reduce staff time spent on processing orders, it might focus on variables related to staff involvement and processing time.
Procurement Cost Reduction is a critical KPI that quantifies the tangible savings realized through effective procurement strategies. By comparing the costs of goods or services over time, procurement managers can quantify the impact of their cost-saving measures.
For example, if a product was initially purchased at a certain price and later procured at a lower cost due to successful negotiation or supplier change, the difference is the hard savings achieved. These savings can be plotted over time, allowing for a visual representation of procurement cost reduction over the years.
Furthermore, breaking down the cost savings by supplier category enables managers to identify which categories yield the highest savings. This information can guide future procurement strategies, such as focusing more on those categories that present the greatest cost-saving opportunities.
Streamlining the supplier lifecycle management, leveraging supply chain analytics, and training staff on cost-saving measures are recommended strategies for maximizing procurement cost reduction. This KPI is especially important to top management as it directly affects the company’s bottom line and can contribute to long-term profitability.
Procurement Cost Avoidance refers to measures taken to prevent potential future costs. Unlike procurement cost reduction, these “soft savings” may not be quantifiable in a direct manner but are nonetheless essential to a successful procurement strategy.
Cost avoidance strategies could include preventative actions like replacing parts before failure to prevent further damage and associated costs. While these savings may not be immediately apparent on the income statement, they can still contribute to overall cost efficiency in the long run.
This KPI often targets strategic spending, such as new investments or technologies, which lack prior purchase comparisons. While these measures might be overlooked by top management due to their indirect impact on the income statement, they add strategic value by mitigating future financial risk.
To optimize procurement cost avoidance, it’s a good idea to develop an internal strategy to map cost-avoidance efforts. This, combined with cost reduction measures, can help paint a comprehensive picture of the company’s overall cost-saving efforts. Strategies like entering into long-term contracts to safeguard against future price fluctuations are examples of effective cost-avoidance measures..
Procurement ROI is a vital KPI that determines the profitability of procurement investments. Unlike traditional ROI, procurement ROI is calculated by dividing the annual cost savings by the annual internal cost of procurement, expressed as a ratio. It offers valuable insights into the cost-effectiveness and profitability of procurement functions.
However, it should not be viewed in isolation, as it needs to be analyzed in conjunction with other KPIs to get a comprehensive picture of procurement performance. It’s also worth noting that this metric doesn’t factor in cost avoidance. Therefore, if procurement investments are low, the ROI may only reflect hard cost savings without considering cost avoidance and other value chain improvements.
A target of setting the Procurement ROI ten times higher than the internal investments for the procurement department is generally considered a sound strategy. However, care should be taken to ensure that this target doesn’t overshadow other important factors, such as supplier relationships and overall value chain improvements.
The Supplier Defect Rate is an essential KPI that quantifies the performance and reliability of individual suppliers, especially in terms of the quality of their products. It’s a measure of the percentage of products received from a supplier that fail to meet predetermined compliance and quality specifications.
This KPI is particularly critical in high-stakes industries such as aerospace, defense, and automotive, where the repercussions of a defective product can be significant. For these industries, the Supplier Defect Rate not only determines the reliability of a supplier but also has implications for safety, performance, and the overall quality of the end product. Tracking and analyzing this metric helps identify the most reliable suppliers and understand the types of defects that occur most frequently.
The most effective use of the Supplier Defect Rate KPI is not just in its measurement but in its breakdown. By categorizing defects according to type, the procurement team can gain actionable insights into the areas where suppliers need to improve. Moreover, it can help identify patterns in defects, which could lead to proactive measures to prevent future defects.
The end goal of analyzing this metric is to ensure that the supply chain is reliable and efficient, and it delivers high-quality products. A low Supplier Defect Rate indicates a reliable supplier who consistently provides high-quality products, whereas a high rate may suggest the need for supplier development or even a change in suppliers.
Supplier Availability is a critical KPI in procurement that measures the reliability of suppliers in terms of their ability to fulfill orders. A high Supplier Availability rate indicates that the supplier is often able to meet the demand, which is crucial in today’s fast-paced business environment where consumer habits are constantly changing.
In the era of omnichannel retail, where consumers expect seamless shopping experiences across different platforms, managing supplier availability efficiently is of paramount importance. If a supplier consistently shows low availability, it could disrupt business operations, leading to stock-outs, delayed deliveries, and potential loss of sales and customer trust.
Monitoring this KPI helps businesses understand the degree of reliability they can place on their suppliers. It allows them to identify suppliers who consistently meet demands and those who do not, thus informing strategic decisions such as contract renewals, renegotiations, or even changing suppliers.
Aiming for a Supplier Availability rate of over 90% can help ensure the smooth functioning of the supply chain and greater efficiency. However, businesses should also consider other factors, such as quality, cost, and delivery time when evaluating supplier performance.
This KPI measures the percentage of procurement spending with suppliers who meet specific environmental or social responsibility criteria. It’s essentially a ratio of sustainable procurement spend and total procurement spend.
As businesses become more environmentally conscious and socially responsible, sustainable procurement practices become increasingly important. A higher sustainable procurement rate can indicate a commitment to sustainability and corporate social responsibility (CSR), potentially enhancing the company’s reputation, reducing environmental impact, and contributing to broader societal goals. If this rate is low, the company may need to consider integrating more sustainable suppliers into their supply chain or encouraging current suppliers to adopt more sustainable practices.
This KPI is all about time and financial efficiency in procurement processes. Achieving a high percentage of purchases within the stipulated time and budget is indicative of a well-managed and efficient procurement system. An average of 81% is a decent performance, but the ideal target should be 100%. This difference between actual and ideal targets points to areas in the procurement pipeline that may require optimization or improvement.
However, it’s also important to note that flexibility is key in procurement. Unexpected issues can arise, which may cause delays or require additional expenses. Therefore, a procurement department must also be equipped to handle such situations effectively, without significantly compromising the time and budget KPIs.
If this KPI is not being met, a deeper analysis should be carried out to uncover the root causes. This could involve scrutinizing individual categories and identifying those with significantly lower values. The insights gained can guide strategies to improve procurement processes and resource utilization.
Inventory Turnover is a KPI showing how many times a company has sold and replaced inventory during a given period. It’s a ratio of the cost of goods sold (COGS) and the average inventory during the given period. A low turnover implies weak sales and, therefore, excess inventory, while a high ratio implies strong sales.
This metric can provide insight into the company’s operational efficiency and profitability. A high Inventory Turnover rate could mean robust sales, efficient inventory management, or low holding of inventory.
However, it may also indicate that the company has too little inventory and may lose sales because of inventory shortages. Conversely, a low turnover rate might imply weak sales, overstocking, or obsolescence issues. Analyzing this KPI can help organizations optimize their inventory levels and improve cash flow.
You’ve taken the time to understand the importance of procurement KPIs and how they can revolutionize your organization’s procurement process. Now, it’s time to take the next leap. But don’t worry, you won’t be doing it alone — we’re here to help you every step of the way!
At Databox, we understand that setting up a KPI dashboard can be a daunting task, especially if you’re doing it for the first time. That’s why we are excited to offer our free setup service for your procurement KPI dashboard.
We are committed to helping you transition smoothly into data-driven decision-making. Our team of product experts will work closely with you to understand your unique needs and design a customized dashboard that fits your organization perfectly. You’ll even get advice on how to structure your reporting processes!
Your new dashboard will not only track the KPIs mentioned in this article but also be flexible enough to incorporate any other metrics you wish to monitor. With real-time data at your fingertips, you’ll be able to make quicker, smarter, and more efficient procurement decisions that drive your business forward.
Imagine having a clear, visual representation of your procurement process, with insights on supplier performance, cost efficiency, order cycles, and much more, all in one place. No more time-consuming manual data analysis, no more guessing games — just actionable insights that help you optimize your procurement strategies.
Are you ready to take your procurement process to the next level? Get in touch with us today, and let’s start building your custom procurement KPI dashboard, free of charge!
Hey, we’re Databox.Our mission is to help businesses save time and grow faster. Click here to see our platform in action.
Are you maximizing your business potential? Stop guessing and start comparing with companies like yours.
At Databox, we’re obsessed with helping companies more easily monitor, analyze, and report their results. Whether it’s the resources we put into building and maintaining integrations with 100+ popular marketing tools, enabling customizability of charts, dashboards, and reports, or building functionality to make analysis, benchmarking, and forecasting easier, we’re constantly trying to find ways to help our customers save time and deliver better results.
Davor is an English literature graduate and an avid reader with a passion for languages. Working as a translator, editor, and writer has allowed him to learn about a wide range of topics — making him something of a jack-of-all-trades when it comes to content. In his spare time, he reads, plays video games and boardgames, and runs/plays tabletop RPGs.
Get practical strategies that drive consistent growth