Page and post “likes” may not lead to any actual real-world behavior. Learn how they can.
| Apr 19
Databox on November 9, 2015 • 7 minuteread
It wasn’t until 2005 that I began to understand how powerful email could be, though. That year, the media company I worked for began seeing declining response rates to its emails. We relied on those messages to deliver leads to our clients, and because clients paid on a per lead basis the decline in response was threatening revenue. At the same time, there were a couple areas of the business where demand for our programs was so high we regularly sold out of email inventory, since we were unwilling to send any given person more than one email per day (I know, I know – still a lot. This was 2005, remember?). As the manager of our email products, it fell on me to solve this riddle: how do we drive more leads and create more inventory without messaging our subscribers any more frequently than we already did?
In other words, how do we get the right content delivered to only those people who actually want it?
We were already segmenting our email subscribers based on the topics they told us they were interested in when they signed up. But I thought we could factor in another dimension to how we were cutting our lists by taking a look at what other content people were consuming on our sites. Fast forward a couple months and a lot of quality time spent with our analytics team, and we automated targeting for all campaigns to rely primarily on how people behaved on our websites. Ten years ago, that required a hell of a lot of custom development. But it was worth it: the number of people we emailed for any given promotion declined by 50% on average, doubling inventory overnight. And the response to those promotions increased by 10% overnight.
That’s the first time I truly realized how powerful email could be when it came to that whole “right message to the right person at the right time” thing.
Thankfully, it’s gotten a lot easier in the last decade to target emails very precisely, thanks to marketing automation software. Marketing automation lets you trigger messaging based on a recipient meeting certain predefined conditions, like having recently signed up; or having bought a specific product; or interacted with your app a certain way. As a category, it encompasses more than email – there are platforms that will automate landing page creation and social media messaging. But at it’s core, marketing automation revolves around email.
And there’s no shortage of vendors that make it possible for you to automate email marketing campaigns. There are lightweight providers, like Drip or Campaign Monitor (where, full disclosure, I previously ran marketing), that make it dead easy to send things like triggered welcome emails or simple onboarding workflows. Then there are more powerful vendors, like Hubspot or Marketo, that let you automate more than email and can support very sophisticated campaigns.
In total, there are more than 200 marketing automation vendors out there. Yet, very few marketers are actually using the technology. To illustrate the relationship between the number of vendors, the adoption of marketing automation, and the impact on marketing campaign results, we pulled together a Databox Spotlight datagraphic.
When you look at the stats, it’s clear there’s a wide gap between the technology that’s available and the number of marketers taking advantage of it. So I figured it would be worthwhile to address five common reasons marketers who have heard of marketing automation haven’t jumped on the bandwagon yet.
Marketing automation can get complicated – no argument there. But it doesn’t have to be overwhelming. The key is to get yourself organized around what you’re trying to achieve – namely,
In other words, get clear on what you want to send to whom; how they’ll receive the message; and when they should get it. This is your messaging framework, and you don’t need to get crazy with it. Here’s an example of a lightweight messaging framework template we use at Databox.
Again, that all depends on what you need to do and how large your subscriber base is. Campaign Monitor has plans that start at $9/mo for 500 subscribers. Hubspot plans start at $200/mo for 100 contacts. Drip is 2,500 subscribers for $49/mo.
Of course, vendors like Pardot, Marketo and Eloqua are more expensive – you’ll need to plan on investing at least $1k/mo to start, and depending on your business you can quickly find yourself investing six figures annually in your marketing automation platform.
But it all comes down to knowing your requirements (see above) and the economics of your business. If you have a keen understanding of both, the investment in automation is worth it. Which brings me to my next point…
There is always ROI in sending content that’s more relevant to the recipient! But if you need further convincing, a study by Autopilot found that marketers who adopted marketing automation generated twice as many leads as those who were using old-school “email blasts.”
You need data to be a digital marketer. Here are a couple options to consider:
This has always been my favorite objection to address. Marketing tech, as a general rule, is intimidating – no doubt about it. But there are a few things you can keep in mind to lessen the intimidation factor:
The data doesn’t lie – marketing automation truly does pay off. If you’re still on the fence, post your questions in the comments or tweet @databoxHQ and I’ll do my best to help you out.
| Apr 19
| Apr 17