As a sales manager, understanding where to focus coaching isn’t always obvious. Without context on why someone is underperforming, it’s difficult to know whether a rep needs more activity, better conversion, or support in how they’re running deals.
This example shows how visualizing activity, conversion, and revenue by rep in a single dashboard creates that missing context. With this view, coaching becomes more targeted, priorities are clearer, and decisions are based on data instead of gut feeling.
Tracking paid ads beyond clicks reveals which channels actually drive MQLs, meetings, and deals. The key signal is whether downstream outcomes appear after leads enter HubSpot. If they don’t, attribution is incomplete and optimization decisions are based on partial data.
Impressions and conversions alone do not show business impact. Once leads move into lifecycle stages like MQL or SQL, teams need CRM data blended with ad spend to see what is truly working.
When calculating CPL, spend must match the filtered source. Including ad spend from channels that did not contribute to those leads inflates CPL and obscures performance. Filtering by source and campaign keeps calculations accurate.
How can sales managers tell why a rep is underperforming?
By viewing activity, conversion, and revenue together, managers can see whether underperformance is driven by low effort, poor conversion, or how deals are being executed.
What’s the difference between activity problems and execution problems in sales?
If activity is high, but deals won or win rates are low, the issue is usually execution or qualification. If both activity and results are low, the focus should be on consistency and pipeline generation.
Why is it useful to compare sales reps side by side?
Rep-to-rep comparisons add context to individual performance. They help managers see who is ahead, who is behind, and whether an issue is isolated or shared across the team.
How does this dashboard help reduce gut-feel decision-making?
By putting activity, conversion, and outcomes in one place with clear comparisons, managers can base coaching decisions on visible performance signals instead of opinions or instinct.